Can I Still Get Workers’ Compensation if the Injury Was My Fault?

Group 152

Table of Contents

In legal contexts, various systems attribute liability based on fault or negligence. However, when it comes to workers’ compensation, the landscape shifts dramatically. The foundational principle here is “strict liability,” which means the system doesn’t hinge on the fault of the injured worker or the employer.

The Principle of Strict Liability in Workers’ Compensation

Setting Aside the Question of Negligence

The primary characteristic of the workers’ compensation system is its faultless nature. In essence, the question isn’t whether the injured worker was negligent or whether their behavior played a part in the accident. The spotlight isn’t on individual fault but rather on the injury and its implications.

Similarly, employer negligence isn’t a determinant. An employer could be entirely at fault for an injury at the workplace, but this doesn’t impact the injured worker’s ability to claim benefits. Both parties stand on equal grounds in the eyes of the law when it comes to workers’ compensation.

Activities Outside the Scope of Employment

While the system leans towards protecting workers, there are exceptions. Certain actions or activities might be considered so ill-advised or out of the scope of regular job duties that they exclude a worker from compensation. The core consideration here is foreseeability.

If a court determines that an injury resulted from a foreseeable consequence of regular job duties, even if the worker was at fault, they can still claim benefits. It’s when actions diverge significantly from what’s foreseeable that complications arise.

Workers’ Compensation as an Exclusive Remedy

A unique feature of the workers’ compensation system is its exclusivity. When an individual suffers an injury at the workplace, they might wonder about the avenues of redress available to them, especially if the employer’s negligence was a contributing factor.

However, the workers’ compensation statute stands as the exclusive remedy in such scenarios. This means that an injured worker can’t file a separate negligence claim against their employer, even if the employer’s actions directly resulted in the injury. This principle underscores the system’s primary goal: to ensure quick and efficient compensation without entangling parties in lengthy negligence lawsuits.

Learn More About Pursuing Workers’ Compensation for an Injury That Was Your Fault

Understanding the unique characteristics of the workers’ compensation system is crucial for both employees and employers. By recognizing its principles of strict liability and exclusivity, individuals can better navigate their rights and responsibilities, ensuring a smoother path to recovery and redress after workplace injuries. Contact Mottaz & Sisk Injury Law today to speak with an attorney on whether you’re eligible for workers’ compensation if the injury was your fault.